Who should use CDs ? (was Re: [om] yet again - Standard .. Ontologies for Math)
paul at ags.uni-sb.de
Sat Jun 9 22:41:06 CEST 2001
I fully agree except for the last sentence.
The latter raises a very interesting question:
Who (i.e. which role) should use a CD definition ?
Allow me at least to add content authors which intend to use the
phrasebooks as well as the presentation capabilities (which are never
really mentionned but exist, eg for OMdoc).
On Saturday, June 9, 2001, at 09:42 PM, Andrew Solomon wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it isn't a requirement
> of OpenMath to say it formally. Naturally, it would be nice, but it
> is an optional extra. The idea of a CD definition is to inform
> human phrasebook writers.
= Paul Libbrecht Java developer The ActiveMath project =
= http://www.activemath.org/~paul paul at activemath.org =
om at openmath.org - general discussion on OpenMath
Post public announcements to om-announce at openmath.org
Automatic list maintenance software at majordomo at openmath.org
Mail om-owner at openmath.org for assistance with any problems
More information about the Om