[Om] name of OMS
ch.lange at jacobs-university.de
Fri Aug 1 02:51:43 CEST 2008
the discussion on what to call a symbol reminds me of another issue. I've
never liked the element name CDDefinition. Especially if we follow David's
reasoning that an OMS _is_ a symbol, whereas a symbol is _defined_ in a CD,
shouldn't the name of that element be something like SymbolDefinition? After
all, it is a definition of a symbol, not a definition of a CD. Well, it is
a definition _in_ a CD, but that is IMHO not worth being materialised in an
element name. In the ontology (subdirectory owl) I have named that thing
SymbolDefinition. The only argument against doing it in the Relax NG is, of
course, that it would break compatibility.
Christoph Lange, DERI Galway/Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://openmath.org/pipermail/om/attachments/20080801/b899bbdd/attachment.pgp
More information about the Om