[Om] name of OMS

[Christoph LANGE]

Dear David, dear all,

On Friday 01 August 2008 09:04:15 David Carlisle wrote:
> Yes it's best not to "see" the CD prefix on the element names at all,
> just thing of them as a pre-namespaces namespace mechanism (rather like
> the OM prefix on openmath instance elements). If you read it as CD
> Definition then it could be thought to mena definition of a CD, but if
> you read it as CD:Definition then it's the Definition element in the CD
> Vocabulary which is a better reading.

But then, wouldn't OpenMath 3 be a good opportunity to get rid of
old-fashioned namespace replacements?  We've had XML namespaces for almost 10
years now, after all.

Cheers,

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Lange, DERI Galway/Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://openmath.org/pipermail/om/attachments/20080801/987a8dbf/attachment.pgp