<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Dear James, dear all, <br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29.04.18 11:15, James Davenport
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:8C3ACFED-C567-4F23-98CF-39207B729653@bath.ac.uk">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      Thanks for starting this debate: a useful corollary to the
      decision to go GitHub. I propose that “CD Editor” becomes plural,
      and we start having a team.</blockquote>
    I second that, that would get us around the
    "single-point-of-failure/delay" problem. <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:8C3ACFED-C567-4F23-98CF-39207B729653@bath.ac.uk"> I have
      no immediate intention of stepping down, but Michael’s Post has
      made me realise how ad hominem the current system is. Presumably
      the editors should essentially (I.e. apart from sysadmins) be
      those with push rights to this repository. 
    </blockquote>
    I would suggest a new "team" of CD Editors at the GithHub level, and
    have three editors and James as Editor-in-chief. a<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:8C3ACFED-C567-4F23-98CF-39207B729653@bath.ac.uk">
      <div>A change log would be necessary.</div>
    </blockquote>
    I think the GitHub log should be sufficient, if people give good
    commit messages. <br>
    <br>
    Michael <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:8C3ACFED-C567-4F23-98CF-39207B729653@bath.ac.uk">
      <div> I wonder (no real views either way - what do those with
        experience of larger/longer lasting projects think) whether a
        simple text (probably actually HTML) file will suffice. 
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>James<br>
        <br>
        <div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPhone</div>
        <div><br>
          On 29 Apr 2018, at 09:42, Michael Kohlhase <<a
            href="mailto:michael.kohlhase@fau.de" moz-do-not-send="true">michael.kohlhase@fau.de</a>>
          wrote:<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div>
            <p>Dear all, <br>
            </p>
            <p>as you know, we have been reorganizing the OpenMath
              resources and web site as multiple repositories at [1]
              <br>
            </p>
            <p>In particular we have the new CDs repository [2], which
              has the CD resources and feeds the CD web site [3]<br>
            </p>
            <p>The idea is that [2] should facilitate CD development by
              providing public source access, issues, pull requests, and
              notifications. Now, the first outside user (Jacob Beal)
              has taken advantage of this first by raising an issue [4],
              and then providing a pull request [5] which is currently
              being discussed. In a nutshell the proposal is to add
              negated binary connectives nor, nand, and nxor to
              logic1.ocd.<br>
            </p>
            <p>So far so good, but this raises the question of how the
              CD approval process should be organized (technically).
              <br>
            </p>
            <p>The OpenMath Standard [6] only says<br>
            </p>
            <div>
              <h3 id="cdapprove">> 4.5 Content Dictionaries Reviewing
                Process</h3>
              <p>> The <i>OpenMath</i> Society is responsible for
                implementing a review and referee
                <br>
                > process to assess the accuracy of the mathematical
                content of Content Dictionaries.
                <br>
                > The status (see <small><code>CDStatus</code></small>)
                and/or the version number (see
                <small><code>CDVersion</code></small> ) of a Content |<br>
                > Dictionary may change as a result of this review
                process. </p>
            </div>
            <p>which leaves the process open and the OpenMath Society
              delegates the responsibility to its CD Editor (James
              Davenport).
              <br>
            </p>
            <p>James and I have started discussing the technical process
              of approving CD revisions. We propose that we make the
              GitHub-supported process we have started with Jacob's
              proposal the standard and document it in the README of 
              [2].
              <br>
            </p>
            <p>Here is what we think the process should be. <br>
            </p>
            <ol>
              <li>An extension proposal is made via a GitHub issue at
                [2] and discussed there. <br>
              </li>
              <li>The discussion is concretized into a pull request (PR)
                to [2] that is discussed further on the PR (including
                inline comments) until all issues are resolved.
                <br>
              </li>
              <li>James explicitly approves the PR and someone with push
                rights merges it. <br>
              </li>
              <li>the changes are announced and added to a changelog. <br>
              </li>
            </ol>
            <p>We would like your input on this proposal (in particular
              what we should do for 4.)</p>
            <p>James & Michael <br>
            </p>
            <p><br>
            </p>
            <p>[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://github.com/OpenMath"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/OpenMath</a></p>
            <p>[2] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs</a></p>
            <p>[3] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="http://openmath.org/cd/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://openmath.org/cd/</a>
              <br>
            </p>
            <p>[4] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs/issues/32"
                moz-do-not-send="true">
                https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs/issues/32</a><br>
            </p>
            <p>[5] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs/pull/34"
                moz-do-not-send="true">
                https://github.com/OpenMath/CDs/pull/34</a></p>
            <p>[6] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.openmath.org/standard/om20-2017-07-22/omstd20.html#cdapprove"
                moz-do-not-send="true">
http://www.openmath.org/standard/om20-2017-07-22/omstd20.html#cdapprove</a></p>
            <p>[7] <br>
            </p>
            <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase,  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://kwarc.info/kohlhase" moz-do-not-send="true">http://kwarc.info/kohlhase</a>, skype: mibein42

Professur für Wissensrepräsentation & -verarbeitung
  Informatik, FAU Erlangen Nürnberg, Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Room 11.139,
  tel/fax: (49) 9131-85-64052/55, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:michael.kohlhase@fau.de" moz-do-not-send="true">michael.kohlhase@fau.de</a> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
            <span>Om mailing list</span><br>
            <span><a href="mailto:Om@openmath.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true">Om@openmath.org</a></span><br>
            <span><a
                href="http://mailman.openmath.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/om"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://mailman.openmath.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/om</a></span><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase,  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://kwarc.info/kohlhase">http://kwarc.info/kohlhase</a>, skype: mibein42

Professur für Wissensrepräsentation & -verarbeitung
  Informatik, FAU Erlangen Nürnberg, Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Room 11.139,
  tel/fax: (49) 9131-85-64052/55, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:michael.kohlhase@fau.de">michael.kohlhase@fau.de</a> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
</pre>
  </body>
</html>