[Om3] binary vs n-ary relations

[Professor James Davenport]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Making them n-ary doesn't solve the classical writing of
>  a < b > c
> which is used quite often still.
Is it? Oh my God ....
I assume one can therefore say a < b > c < d > e ...
(where e is not necessarily the base of the natural logarithms)
> So another workaround is neither whatsoever and I think it should be at the
> notations' level.
Hear here.
James