[Om] invisible times and invisible plus
Professor James Davenport
jhd at cs.bath.ac.uk
Mon Aug 31 23:11:52 CEST 2009
On Mon, August 31, 2009 8:39 pm, Christoph LANGE wrote:
> 2009-08-31 17:06 Professor James Davenport <jhd at cs.bath.ac.uk>:
>> I suspect we want to be able to write
>> <OMS cd="presentation_hacks" name="use_symbol"/>
>> <OMFOREIGN encoding="MathML-Presentation">
>> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
>> <OMS name="plus" cd="arith1"/>
>> or some such.
> Indeed, good point. I think that would almost work out of the box with
> the existing implementations of renderers.
That would be truly wonderful. It would solve the 'my group operation is
called' problem quite neatly.
> However, it may easily become more intricate. Suppose the default way of
> rendering division (according to some *.ntn notation dictionary) is a/b
> instead of
I'm probably being dense here, but I don't see what the default rendering
of division has to do with the issue.
Unless, of course, we assume our rendered comes across mixed_fraction,
doesn't understand it, applies the FMP, and then tries to render the
> then the approach above would no longer work. Instead we'd have to
> the complete (plus a (divide b c)) expression with, well, maybe some
But there wouldn't be (plus a (divide b c)) fragment unless the FMP had
> Presentation MathML fragment with placeholders that would then be replaced
> by the renderings of the respective arguments. Something similar to the
> patterns in those pattern-matching-based notations.
Recently: Visiting Full Professor, University of Waterloo
Now back as:
Acting Head of Department, Computer Science,
Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology and
Chairman, Powerful Computing WP, University of Bath
OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009
IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication
More information about the Om