[Om] OpenMath on the Semantic Web?
jzimmer at ags.uni-sb.de
Tue Feb 3 01:41:16 CET 2009
I agree with your criticism.
But you didn't mention the 'or' in
'...there are no ontologies or other explicit semantics involved.'
Maybe what the reviewers referred to was
'...explicit formal semantics.'
Ontology languages directly correspond to (some subset of) first-order
logic with its classical formal semantics. That's something I haven't
seen in OpenMath so far.
In general, I have always regarded the parallel development of the
Semantic Web and OpenMath (CDs) as a real pity, because in principal
both communities more or less want the same thing.
Anyway, that's my 10cents.
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Hello fellow OpenMathers,
> I wanted to draw your attention to that blog post I made:
> where I rant against a formal disqualification we endured while
> claiming that an OpenMath research had to do with the semantic web.
> Om mailing list
> Om at openmath.org
More information about the Om