[Om3] Binding Integral symbols (was [Fwd: MathML CDs])

[David Carlisle]

> I don't think they do:
> int(sin(x),x) is not the case as int(sin(y),y): one would be -cos(x) and
> the other -cos(y).

I'm not sure why we can't keep the OM symbols for integration  as they
are, add equivalent symbols in the MML CDs, and then just deal with the
fact that Content MathML uses <int><bvar> for indefinite integration
which doesn't bind variables in the mapping between this "legacy" syntax
and the canonical syntax.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________