[Om3] OMS and OMV contents?

[David Carlisle]

> Actually, I just realize that this is not (currently) valid MathML, the 
> first element of a semantics element is actually the presentation 

No you can put content in forst and annotate it with presentation if you
want there are explicit annotation-xml types for annotating with content
or presentation, mathml2 said

> Another possible use here is to embed, for example, the presentation tag
> form of a construct given in content tag form in the first child element
> of semantics (or vice versa). annotation-xml has an attribute "encoding"
> defining the form in use. 

>  Also I am not sure that we should use semantics here at all, we 
> could also use <attribution>
we could, but to be honest I don't yet see _any_ use of semantics where
we couldn't use attribution (or visa versa)

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________