[Om3] Two more CDBase questions

[Christoph LANGE]

On Tuesday 13 May 2008 12:53:15 Michael Kohlhase wrote:
> Ah, I get the difference. Is this what you are trying to say?
>
> If we assume that in an ideal future we have cdbase-aware copy/paste,
> then we are likely only to have it for the in-MOBJ case, not for the
> CDSignatures --> MOBJ case.

Yes, and I think the justification was that every MOBJ should be
self-contained, not requiring any contextual information from its enclosing
CD, signature dictionary, whatever.

Best,

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Lange, DERI Galway/Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://openmath.org/pipermail/om3/attachments/20080513/07bf1c2e/attachment.pgp