[Om3] CD-review little report

[David Carlisle]

> I personally would like there to be a unary integration, as the inverse of
> unary differentiation, and would find it hard to argue for the existence
> of one and not the other.

I'm confused by this thread. I tried to trace it back but I couldn't
find the origin of this issue. For indefinite integration OM has
only had unary integratikn operator taking a function.  There've been
some proposals to add a form that takes a term and a variable, but
not to remove the existing symbols, has there?

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________