[Om3] trouble with container markup example
Professor James Davenport
jhd at cs.bath.ac.uk
Thu Feb 12 01:58:34 CET 2009
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Le 11-févr.-09 à 23:53, Professor James Davenport a écrit :
> > > You are absolutely right Robert,
> > > and I fear that both OpenMath and MathML content are having
> > > subset_suchthat (the set of things inside a reference set such that
> > > some condition holds) but miss
> > > set_of_expressions_such_that
> > The reason fro this, as I recall, is to avoid Russell's paradox.
>
> But you do not hit the Russel's paradox since the
Not in this case, I admit. But at the time we were unsure how to bar
Russell's paradox but allow more expressivity.
> set_of_expressions_such_that( x, domain, f )
> = map(f,suchthat(x,domain))
>
> The issue is having to use map, I think where one wishes to speak of the set
> of function-results and not speak about applying f to the set.
But OpenMath does not imply computation :-)
> Map sounds like it should be called range to me... but that is superficial.
Could be, but it's there.
James
More information about the Om3
mailing list