[Om3] Initializing OM3 at 2013 Process

[Chris Rowley]

Thanks, Lars.

Yes I had misunderstood the canned report that I used.  So now I have learnt how to roll it myself, and found that this one with dates is quite useful:

https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/query?status=assigned&status=new&time=..&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&col=reporter&order=priority

!! And many many thanks to Christoph for looking at all 35 of his already!

It is not clear what the status of ‘owner’ meant 6 or 3 years ago, but it may still be relevant to some reports.
In particular for those repotted by non-members of the current group: 'polx’ (who also still is owner of some) and 
‘jauecker’.

chris


 
On 15 May 2014, at 17:49, Lars Hellström <Lars.Hellstrom at residenset.net> wrote:

> Chris Rowley skrev 2014-05-15 08.05:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I did a little exploratory work in anticipation of tomorrow’s chat.
>> 
>> On 3 May 2014, at 20:53, Michael Kohlhase<m.kohlhase at jacobs-university.de>  wrote:
>> 
>>> I have done some triaging already and closed some, but there are quite a
>>> few still interesting. Maybe you can also have a look (and/or suggest
>>> that others do that as well on the mailing list)
>> 
>> So I looked at:
>> 
>>    http://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/report/9
>> 
>> There are 72 entries, only 5 of which are not classified as ‘new’ -- whilst most are in fact by now
>> at least 4 years old.
>> 
>> Thus almost all of these were initiated by members of the current group many years ago.
>> 
>> Mostly by just one: Michael!!  James also has a noticeable number, Christoph a few and David just one.
> 
> Collating by "owner" is a probably bit skewed; I suspect Michael is getting them by default. If instead collating by reporter:
> 
> https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=reporter&order=priority
> 
> I get Christoph as winner with 35, Michael as second with 23, and far behind polx (5), me (4), jauecker (3), and James (2).
> 
> A not-very-daring conjecture is also that this reflects how familiar people are with using this particular trac server. ;-)
> 
>> REQUEST:
>> It would probably be most efficient if the relevant members of this group look quickly here at those labelled
>> ‘new’ that they initiated
> 
> Does that mean reporter now?
> 
> /Lars Hellström
> 
> 
>> (and are more than a year old) and triage them as:
> 
>> -  should have been closed or otherwise discarded long ago;
>> 
>> -  need checking (also maybe suggest best person to do this);
>> 
>> -  definitely still need attention.
>> 
>> I suspect that most are in the first category.
> 
> 
> 
>> Thanks for you attention!
>> 
>> chris
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Om3 mailing list
>> Om3 at openmath.org
>> http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Om3 mailing list
> Om3 at openmath.org
> http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3