[Trac] [OpenMath] #41: sort out the namespace for notation definition

[OpenMath]

#41: sort out the namespace for notation definition
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
     Reporter:  kohlhase      |          Owner:  kohlhase  
         Type:  task          |         Status:  new       
     Priority:  major         |      Milestone:  CD3 Draft1
    Component:  OM3 Standard  |        Version:            
   Resolution:                |       Keywords:            
Include_gantt:  0             |   Dependencies:            
   Due_assign:  YYYY/MM/DD    |      Due_close:  YYYY/MM/DD
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by jhd):

 "This also means that we have to decide where the responsibility for them
 [JHD: I assume Notation elements] lies. Probably OpenMath." According to
 Davenport/Libbrecht (to appear in Mathematics in Computer Science:
 http://hdl.handle.net/10247/468) responsibility for notation elements can
 lie anywhere. I expect the real question is where responsibility for the
 language to WRITE notation elements lies. This I think is certainly wider
 than OMDoc. Since it is largely attached to CDs, I too would guess that
 OpenMath is the answer. Whether we want to use the same namespace, or a
 new one, is a question I will leave to namespace gurus.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/ticket/41#comment:2>
OpenMath <http://www.openmath.org>
The development of the OpenMath Standard and Content Dictionaries.