[Trac] [OpenMath] #49: CD veccalc1
OpenMath
trac at strawberry.eecs.jacobs-university.de
Wed Sep 3 17:19:34 CEST 2008
#49: CD veccalc1
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: jauecker | Owner: kohlhase
Type: proposal | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: CD3 Draft1
Component: OM3 Standard | Version:
Keywords: | Include_gantt: 0
Dependencies: | Due_assign: YYYY/MM/DD
Due_close: YYYY/MM/DD |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
'''Chris:'''
I am still working on the descriptions here (applied maths was never
my strong point:-). There seems to be some confusion about
vectors of vector-valued functions etc. Why not 'functions from r^n
to R^k' ??
I do not think that the concept `vector of functions' appears anywhere in
these CDs.
---------------
Is this:
`should satisfy the defining relation:'
different from
'is defined as:'
when said 'relation' (not, you will note a boolean expression in this
context) has left hand side precisely the thing being defined?
---------------
I am not convinced that the formula for div is correct (but don't
trust me on this).
---------------
In 'grad', the number of variables, n, of which F is a function should
be made explicit.
---------------
Typos: j --> k and Z --> z in the 'defining relation' for curl (and
maybe use 'invisible times' (I can't believe I wrote that:-). And
boldface for vectors?
Must there be exactly three scalar functions and must they all be of
three variables (the same three)? (A function R^3 --> R^3 ?)
This is not stated.
Oh, and 'x_i (i = 1,...,3)' has now become 'x, y, z' ???
---------------
Maybe some similar comments on M. Laplace's thing, but yet again I
lost the will to follow this stuff:-(.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.kwarc.info/OM3/ticket/49>
OpenMath <http://www.openmath.org>
The development of the OpenMath Standard and Content Dictionaries.
More information about the Trac
mailing list