[Trac] [OpenMath] #44: CD linalg1
OpenMath
trac at strawberry.eecs.jacobs-university.de
Fri Sep 12 23:17:19 CEST 2008
#44: CD linalg1
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jauecker | Owner: kohlhase
Type: proposal | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: CD3 Draft1
Component: OM3 Standard | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Include_gantt: 0 | Dependencies:
Due_assign: YYYY/MM/DD | Due_close: YYYY/MM/DD
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by clange):
@Jakob, here are my ideas about copying the discussion to the
[http://wiki.openmath.org wiki] – Thanks! (''Additional comments that
cannot easily be put into practice are in italics as a to-do for my own
modelling of the
[http://kwarc.info/projects/swim/pubs/lwa08-argumentation.pdf
argumentation ontology]; you can ignore them for copying.'')
* Chris's original post: an Issue with the CD linalg1. ''Actually it's
even an issue with all linalg-related CDs, so we'd either need CDGroups
with associated discussion pages in the wiki, where issues files with a
CDGroup would, where appropriate, propagate down to the CDs or even to the
symbols, or an easy user interface for adding further CDs or symbols
affected by one discussion post. – It might even make sense to split off
the last sentence ("the first line …") into a Justification reply, but no
author of a discussion post would actually make this effort.''
* James's reply: for now, as I do not yet have appropriate types in the
argumentation ontology, a plain reply to the Issue. (Note that I re-
enabled the possibility of replying to Issues with plain comments.)
''Later I need to give this reply a more appropriate type, maybe some
negative = challenging Argument or Justification?''
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/ticket/44#comment:2>
OpenMath <http://www.openmath.org>
The development of the OpenMath Standard and Content Dictionaries.
More information about the Trac
mailing list