[om] Re: comments on documents

David Carlisle davidc at nag.co.uk
Mon May 20 19:12:40 CEST 2002

Only minor quibbles (which I won't bother with) up to this point.

> There is no default
> rendering for OM* but it is possible to associate
> an OM object with a stylesheet.
> *Huh?  what about <OMOBJ> ... </OMOBJ> ?

You lost me completely. Huh what and what about OMOBJ.?
Maybe it was just my phrasing (and as ever my bad typing:-)
By "OM Object" I mean an object encoded in OpenMath.
the OMOBJ element is the top level element in the XML encoding of
openmath, but I don't know why you introduced it into the discussion at
that point.

So after all this discussion it seems that your suggested wording is now
in total agreement with Mike's original comparison that started this
thread, except that it's a bit more explicit on rendering issues.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
om at openmath.org  -  general discussion on OpenMath
Post public announcements to om-announce at openmath.org
Automatic list maintenance software at majordomo at openmath.org
Mail om-owner at openmath.org for assistance with any problems

More information about the Om mailing list