[om] DefMP elements
Taneli Huuskonen
huuskone at cc.helsinki.fi
Wed Dec 3 15:41:27 CET 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Dewar <miked at nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:53:43AM +1300, Bill Naylor wrote:
[...]
> > 1) Dissallowing self reference during a defining FMP, therefore
> > dissallowing recursive definition.
> I think the feeling at Bremen was that this was generally a good thing
> for the defining case. It is of course quite legal for the evaluating
> case.
I'm slightly confused. Do "this" and "it" in the above paragraph refer
to self-reference or to the disallowing of it?
Regards,
Taneli
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBP831vV+t0CYLfLaVEQLLKQCeJuM+eBzkHgGMx7J7w3oPtHMbqA4An32r
mHxCmryY1TDyeBGMUNUQz0jQ
=QrOm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
All messages will be PGP signed, | Hélas, jamais je ne deviendrai
encrypted mail preferred. Keys: | rhinocéros, jamais, jamais! Je ne
http://www.helsinki.fi/~huuskone/ | peux plus changer. -- Ionesco
--
om at openmath.org - general discussion on OpenMath
Post public announcements to om-announce at openmath.org
Automatic list maintenance software at majordomo at openmath.org
Mail om-owner at openmath.org for assistance with any problems
More information about the Om
mailing list