[Om] OpenMath in Wikipedia: was[Fwd: Problematic cases for inria parser]

Professor James Davenport jhd at cs.bath.ac.uk
Fri Nov 20 21:01:51 CET 2009

One of my students writes as foolows, and it is item 3 that worries me.
Compared with OMSTD 2.0, the Wikipedia is wrong.
Shall I just correct it?

 These are the things that the INRIA parser doesn't recognise. I think the
parser is based on version 1.0, as these things do not appear in Standard

 3/ cdgroup
   This appears only in the example in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMath,  I didn't find it in any other
examples and in the standard, so it might be illegal.
James Davenport
Recently: Visiting Full Professor, University of Waterloo
Now back as:
ex-Acting Head of Department, Computer Science,
Lecturer on XX10190, CM30070, CM30078/50123, CM50209
Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology and
Chairman, Powerful Computing WP, University of Bath
OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009
IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication

More information about the Om mailing list