[Om] Consistency in ring1, field1

Andrew Robbins andjrob at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 11:37:08 CET 2009

I have a question regarding the consistency of ring1 and field1 OM 
content dictionaries. In ring1 the unary_minus is called "negation" 
which is consistent with the other operations in rings because it ends 
in "-ation", but in field1 the unary_minus is called "minus". Is there a 
reason for this?


Andrew Robbins

More information about the Om mailing list