[Om] Multistep "equation" symbol?
Professor James Davenport
jhd at cs.bath.ac.uk
Tue May 12 14:48:50 CEST 2009
On Mon, May 11, 2009 6:38 pm, Bruce Miller wrote:
> Lars Hellström wrote:
>> Is there an established OM symbol for "multistep equations" (see
>> example below)? If not, would it make sense as part of some official
>> content dictionary?
> When I've asked such questions in the past,
> I generally got James' (essentially correct) response,
> that it is equivalent to a conjunction of relations.
Thanks fro the compliment.
> I shared your concern that such a multi-something
> is easily converted to the conjunction form, but
There is a legitimate concern here. But I think if one is really handling
such a beast, one wants the ability to mix, e.g. a < b <= c < d.
I also like the abilito to annotate that Lars is asking for.
> less reliably converted back. Perhaps <OMR> would be
> useful here?
> As James points out, your case seems to
> be sort of a proof, or derivation. Each
> rhs follows from, can be derived from, is implied
> by, is the asymptotic expansion of, ...
> it's associated rhs. The set of
> relation(-like) operators, and their sensible
> sequences is tricky, and in general there isn't
> a trivial transitivity.
> The same notation is used as, eg. a < b = c <= d << e,
> where there is (seemingly) less hidden semantic,
> just a shorthand.
> I suspect there are cases where there other
> hidden semantics.
> My main point being, if one _were_ to define
> such a symbol, it would seem that more than one
> "Multi<something>" would be called for.
I suspect, rather, one multi-purpose "reasoning chain" object: the example
above could be recast in terms of \subset, or \subgroup or ...
Visiting Full Professor, University of Waterloo
Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology and
Chairman, Powerful Computing WP, University of Bath
OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009
IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication
More information about the Om